Sorry, this bit isn't funny, just interesting. Perhaps.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=276
This is a rather awkward summary of a much better articulated chapter I recently read in a book called Radical Son by David Horowitz which isn't online, so this shamozzle will have to do.
Basically, it's the story of the two sides of the argument over shutting down bathhouses in San Francisco in the early years of AIDS in the 80s. On one side, some peeps saw immense political value in the bathhouses and promiscuous sex (fuck I hate using words like "promiscuous" it makes me sound like Bronwyn Bishop). On the other side some saw them as public health menaces.
I'm well aware that in some circles David Horotwitz is a declared lunatic, and I ain't sayin' nothin' 'bout nothin' but I think it's at least interesting to consider that a) how we have sex is a powerful political act, and b) when and how to weigh up those politics against practical problems.
And c) I must admit, having largely missed them, I have a powerful nostalgia for the days when being gay was still a bit edgy. Sometimes I think all the bow ties and Robyn concerts in the world won't make up for that.
Also, if I'm late to the intellectual party, and we covered this at Uni in the '90s when I was busy wearing happy pants and unsuccessfully dating women, sorry to have wasted your time, here's a heinous Jennifer Rush remix for your trouble:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yk9fsGiN2Z0
Thanks to listener Gilla for putting me onto this shit.